Tricks to diagnose processes blocked on strong I/O in linux
There’s one aspect of the linux kernel and the GNU operating system and related tools in which it might be lacking behind, specially with kernel 2.4 series. I’m talking about I/O accounting or how to know what’s going on with the hard disc or other devices which are used to write and read data.
The thing is that linux provides you with a few tools with which you can tell what’s going on with the box and its set of discs. Say vmstat provides you with a lot of information and various other files scattered in the /proc filesystem. But that information only tells us about the system globally, so it’s good for diagnosing if a high load on a box is due to some process chewing CPU cycles away or because of the hard disc being hammered and being painfully slow. But what about if you want to know what exactly is going on, which process or processes are responsible for the situation, how do you know? The answer is that Linux doesn’t provide you with tools for that, as far as I know (If you know of any, please leave a comment). There’s no such thing as a top utility for process I/O accounting. The situation is better in Linux 2.6 provided you activate the taskstats accounting module with which you can query information about the processes. The user-space utilities are somewhat scarce, but at least there’s something with which you can start playing.
However there are some tricks you can use to try to find which is the culprit when things go wrong. As usually, many of these tricks come from work where I keep learning from my colleagues, who, by the way, are much more intelligent than I am ;-), when things go wrong and some problem arises that needs immediate action.
So, let’s define the typical scenario on which we could apply these tricks. You’ve got a Linux box which has a high load average. Say 15, 20, etc. As you may know, the load average measures the number of processes that are waiting to be executed on the process queue. That doesn’t necessarily mean that the CPU is loaded when, for example, processes are blocked because of I/O, say a read from the disc because this is slow or something. The CPU would just sit there most of the time being idle. This number makes sense when you know the number of CPU the box has. If you have a loadavg of 2 in a two-CPU box, then you are just fine, ideally.
The number one tool for identifying what’s going on is vmstat, which would tell you a lot of things going on in the box, specially when you execute it periodically as vmstat 1. If you read the man page (and I do recommend you to read it), you can get an idea of all the information what would be going through the screen :-). Click here to see a screen shot of the output of vmstat on 4 different boxes. Almost all of its output is useful for diagnosis, except the last column in the case of a Linux 2.4 box (that value is added to the idle column).
With this tool we can find out if the system is busy on I/O and how. For example by looking at the bo and bi columns. Swapping, when it’s happening, could also imply that the hard disc is being hammered but that would also mean that there’s not enough memory in the system for all the processes running at that very moment. Well, all of its output can be useful for identifying what’s going on.
Ok, so back to our problem, how do we start? Well, the first thing to do is to try to find out what’s on execution that could be causing this. Who are the usual suspects. By looking at ps output we could get an idea of which processes and/or application could be causing the disc I/O. The problem with this is that sometimes an application runs tens or hundreds of processes, each of which is serving a remote client (say apache prefork) and maybe only some of them are causing the havoc, so killing all possible processes is not an option in a production environment (possibly killing the processes causing the problem is feasible because they might be wedged or something).
Finding the suspects
One way to find what processes are causing the writes and reads is to have a look at the processes in uninterruptible sleep state. As the box has a high load average because of I/O, surely there must be processes in such a state because they are waiting for the disc to return back the data and return from their system calls. And these processes are likely to be involved in the high load of the system. If you think that uninterruptible sleep processes cannot be killed you are right, but we are assuming that they are in this state briefly again and again because of reading and writing to the disc non-stop. If you have read the vmstat man page, you must have noticed that the column b tells us the number of processes in such a state.
golan@kore:~$ ps aux | grep " D" root 27351 2.9 0.2 11992 9160 ? DN 23:06 0:08 /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/rdiff-backup -v 5 --restrict-read-only /disk --server mail 28652 0.5 0.0 4948 1840 ? D 23:11 0:00 exim -bd -q5m golan 28670 0.0 0.0 2684 804 pts/23 S+ 23:11 0:00 grep --color D
Here we can see two processes in such a state (noted by D on ps output). Normally we don’t get to see many of these at the same time and if we issue the same command again, we are probably not going to see it again unless there is a problem which is why I’m writing this in the first place :-).
Examining the suspects
Well, we now need to examine the suspects and filter them, because there might be perfectly valid processes that are in uninterruptible sleep state but are not responsible of the high load, so we need to find out. One thing that we could do is attach strace to a specific process and see how it’s doing. This can be easily achieved this way:
golan@kore:~$ strace -p 12766 Process 12766 attached - interrupt to quit write(1, "y\n", 2) = 2
Here we see the output of a process executing yes. So, what does this output tell us? It shows us all the system calls that the process is doing, so we can effectively see if it is reading or writing.
But all this can be very time consuming if we have quite a few processes to examine. What we could do is strace all of them and save their output to different files and then examine them later:
If what we are examining is a process called command, we could do it this way:
# mkdir /tmp/strace
# cd /tmp/strace
# for i in `ps axuwf | grep command | awk '{ print $2 }'`; do (strace -p $i > command-$i.strace 2>&1)& done
What this would do is create a series of files called command-PID-strace, one for each of the processes that match the regular expression in the grep command. If we set this running for a while, we can now examine the contents of all the files. Even better if we display the files ordered by size we would have a pointer to the process that are doing the most system calls. All we would need to do is verify that those system calls are actually read and write system calls. And also, don’t forget to kill all the strace processes that we sent to the background by issuing a killall strace :-)
So now we have a list of processes that are causing lots of reads and writes in the hard disc. What to do next depends on the situation and what you want to do. You might want to kill the processes, or find who (the person) who started them, in case they were started by someone. Or which network connection, IP address, etc etc. There are a bunch of utilities that you can use including strace, netstat, lsof, etc. It’s up to you what to do next.
And…
Well, This is me learning from my colleagues and from problems that arise when you don’t expect them. My understanding of the linux kernel is not that good, but now many of the things that I studied in the Operating System class start to make a little bit more sense. So please, if you have experience with this, know of other ways to get this kind of information, please share it with me (as a comment or otherwise). I’m still learning :)
Installing From Source, The Easy Way
Installing software in any unix-like operating system these days has become very easy. Package managers such as dpkg, the one used by Debian or Ubuntu, take most of the hassle by dealing with all the dependencies and intricacies that modern software has nowadays. It’s just a matter of getting the package that some hard-working and/or generous developer has made and install it in our system. It’s straightforward compared with how things were a mere few years ago.
We’ve always had the possibility of installing from the software, provided we have resolved all the needed dependencies. Installing from the source can be handy and useful at times. We might want to change some options on compile time or we might want to have two versions of the same package installed on different locations for example.
The problem lies when we want to upgrade the software and we have different versions of it installed, we could end up in a very cluttered scenario, say, with files installed across the file system from different versions of it. Even more, we might not have an easy way to track down which files belong to which version, let alone uninstalling the software.
The Easy Way ® ;-)
As always there are simple solutions for complex problems. There is a nice piece of software which helps us to keep track of software packages installed from source in a clean way. It doesn’t work for all cases, but it does a pretty good job for most of them. I’m talking about epkg, The Encap Package Manager.
I’ll try to describe how it works in a not very technical or detailed way, just to get you going with it and then I’ll install it on my system so you’ll be able to see how handy it is.
Basically, all you have to do is install all software packages on a directory on /usr/local/encap, creating a directory for each of them in a package-version.revision fashion. Then we will use epkg to just create symlinks to the appropriate places, usually /usr/local.
So, say we’ve got:
/usr/local/encap/mysoft-1.1/bin/mysoft /usr/local/encap/mysoft-1.1/lib/mysoft.so
epkg would create symlinks such as:
/usr/local/bin/mysoft -> /usr/local/encap/mysoft-1.1/bin/mysoft /usr/local/lib/mysoft.so -> /usr/local/encap/mysoft-1.1/lib/mysoft.so
and that’s it, pretty much. With more complex packages it can get more difficult, but you get the idea.
Let’s just see an example
First of all, we need to install epkg on our system. I will be using an Ubuntu 7.10 system, which, to date, doesn’t have epkg on it. So I will install it from source in the usual way, to /usr/local
root@kore:/usr/local/src# wget ftp://ftp.encap.org/pub/encap/epkg/epkg-2.3.9.tar.gz
--23:47:17-- ftp://ftp.encap.org/pub/encap/epkg/epkg-2.3.9.tar.gz
=> `epkg-2.3.9.tar.gz'
...
23:47:32 (85.66 KB/s) - `epkg-2.3.9.tar.gz' saved [237232]
root@kore:/usr/local/src# tar xfz epkg-2.3.9.tar.gz
root@kore:/usr/local/src# cd epkg-2.3.9/
root@kore:/usr/local/src/epkg-2.3.9#
root@kore:/usr/local/src/epkg-2.3.9# ./configure --prefix=/usr/local
checking for epkg... no
checking for mkencap... no
checking for Encap source directory... /usr/local/encap
checking for Encap target directory... /usr/local
checking for Encap package directory... /usr/local/encap/epkg-2.3.9
checking for gcc... gcc
...
config.status: creating epkg/Makefile
config.status: creating mkencap/Makefile
config.status: creating mkencap/mkencap_environment
config.status: creating doc/Makefile
config.status: creating config.hAs we see, we’ll install the package with its default options, pointing to to /usr/local/encap as the encap directory. Please, see the help for more options.
We install it:
root@kore:/usr/local/src/epkg-2.3.9# make && make install
...
epkg: installing package epkg-2.3.9...
> reading Encap source directory...
> installing package epkg-2.3.9
! man: not an Encap link
> executing postinstall script
installing: /usr/local/etc/mkencap_environment
> installation partially successful
root@kore:/usr/local/src/epkg-2.3.9#If we have a look at /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/encap it has installed itself as an encapped package :), and now we are ready to use it with a real example.
Installing GLE
Say we wanted to install The Graphics Layout Engine, or GLE on our computer and we don’t have a binary package at hand, or we want to control it, or whatever :), let’s just do it with epkg.
- Get the source
root@kore:/usr/local/src# wget http://surfnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/glx/GLE-4.1.1-src.zip root@kore:/usr/local/src# unzip GLE-4.1.1-src.zip root@kore:/usr/local/src# cd gle4/
- Configure: We will be configuring the software to make it believe it is going to be installed on
/usr/localbut we will actually install it on/usr/local/encap/instead, so epkg can deal with it. This is an important step, so let’s just do it by configuring it with those options and with any other that we might want to use:root@kore:/usr/local/src/gle4# aptitude install libpng12-dev libpng12-0 libtiff4-dev libtiff4 libjpeg62-dev libjpeg62 root@kore:/usr/local/src/gle4# ./configure --with-qt=no --prefix=/usr/local ... root@kore:/usr/local/src/gle4# make ...
As you can see, I installed some dev packages (using debian’s aptitude) because they are dependencies for GLE. After that, I configure the package without any graphical environment (based on Qt) and pointing to
/usr/local. Then we compile it. - Installing. Now, we will be installing it on
/usr/local/encap. Bear with me now and I’ll explain what I did after doing it :)root@kore:/usr/local/src/gle4# make DESTDIR=/usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1 install root@kore:/usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1# root@kore:/usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1# mv usr/local/* . root@kore:/usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1# rm -rf usr root@kore:/usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1# ls bin lib share
Ok, we what I’ve done is execute
make installbut setting theDESTDIRvariable (which is supported by GLE’sMakefile) to install it on/usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1. But there, it is usually installed within its own “usr/local” directory, so to make it be as if it were installed on/usr/localhierarchy, we move it to the right place so now we have:/usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1/bin /usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1/lib /usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1/share
and so on.
- Install it with epkg Now the final step is to call epkg to actually create the proper symlinks and that’s it:
root@kore:/usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1# epkg GLE epkg: installing package GLE... > reading Encap source directory... > installing package GLE-4.1.1 > installation successful root@kore:/usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1# root@kore:/usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1# gle GLE version 4.1.1 Usage: gle [options] filename.gle More information: gle -help root@kore:/usr/local/encap/GLE-4.1.1#
And that’s it, really. Now, two things,
- If we install a newer version, say 4.2.0 whenever that’s ready, we just install it on
/usr/local/encap/GLE-4.2.0as we’ve seen before, and simple calling again# epkg GLE
would create the right symlinks (that’s it, “deinstall” the previous version and install the new one.
- If we want to uninstall it, that’s it, remove the symlinks, we simply issue this command:
# epkg -r GLE
and that’s all.
Summary
- epkg lets us install software from source having control over it, ie. Installing it in a clean way, being able to deinstall it and upgrade it without cluttering the file system
- All you have to do is install the software on
/usr/local/encap/package-versionas if were/usr/local. The variableDESTDIRonMakefileshelps us to do it in an easy way. If the software is too simple, you’ll have to do it manually. - Remember
/usr/local/encap/package-version/usr/local/binmust end up as/usr/local/encap/package-version/bin. - Execute
epkg packageto install it andepkg -r packageto uninstall it. - If you have problems with the libraries, try executing
ldconfig. - Be Careful I usually make mistakes, overwrite things and delete files, so take care with what you do and do it under your own responsibility ;-).
Modifying a live linux kernel
Before reading this, I just need to say something:
I’ve no idea of linux, I’ve no idea of programming, I’ve no idea of computers… Everything you read here might have been invented, so, please, do not reproduce what I write here. If you do, bear in mind that you do it under your own responsibility. In fact, what is a computer anyway?
The other day we were having issues with a box that was used as a NFS box among other things. These issues appeared on upgrading this box from kernel 2.4 to kernel 2.6.22.1. These issues were related to locking on the NFS server, because of changing the behaviour of the flock system call on linux 2.6.11-18. From the NFS FAQ:
The NFS client in 2.6.12 provides support for flock()/BSD locks on NFS files by emulating the BSD-style locks in terms of POSIX byte range locks. Other NFS clients that use the same emulation mechanism, or that use fcntl()/POSIX locks, will then see the same locks that the Linux NFS client sees.
The problems we had are related to using NFS and Samba for exporting the same file system and locking not working properly.
SMB supports two types of locks - file-wide locks and byte-range locks.
- File-wide locks
- Called ’share modes’ in SMB parlance
- Also known as ‘BSD-style locks’
- provided by flock() in Linux
- provided by a ’share mode’ flag when opening a file under Win32
- Supported primarily by samba within samba itself by storing in a TDB - get listed under ‘Locked Files’ at the bottom of smbstatus
- May also be enforced in the kernel using flock() if HAVE_KERNEL_SHARE_MODES is 1.
- Byte-range locks
- Called ‘POSIX-style’ locks.
- provided by fcntl(fd, F_GETLK) in POSIX.
- provided by _locking() in Win32
- lockf() is a Linux wrapper around fcntl() for locking the whole file.
- Supported by samba by a ‘Windows to POSIX byte-range overlap conversion layer’ and then fcntl().
Windows applications appear to use both share modes and byterange locks.
In Linux, flock() and fcntl() locks are oblivious to each other, as per http://lxr.linux.no/source/Documentation/locks.txt.
NFSv3 (as a protocol) only supports byte-range locks. However, nfsd does flock() locks on files on the server taken out by other processes - although clients cannot set them themselves. See http://nfs.sourceforge.net/#faq_d10
Unfortunately, linux 2.6.12 adds flock() emulation to the Linux NFS client by translating it into a file-wide fcntl(). This means that flock()s and fcntl()s *do collide* on remote NFS shares, which introduces all the potential application race conditions which Linux avoided by having them oblivious to each other locally. The practical upshot of this is that if you re-share an NFS share via samba, then if a Windows client (e.g. Outlook opening a PST file) opens a file with a share mode, then byte-range locking operations will fail as the lock has already been acquired. (The fact that NFS doesn’t realise the same PID has both locks and allow them both is probably an even bigger problem). The solution for this is to revert bits of the patch responsible: http://www.linux-nfs.org/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.11/linux-2.6.11-18-flock.dif. Disabling share modes in samba is not an option, as it also disables the application-layer TDB support for them - and disabling HAVE_KERNEL_SHARE_MODES will stop other programs (e.g. nfsd) on dump being aware of what’s been flock()ed.
So our solution for our server was reverting this patch on 2.6.11-18 and apply this patch:
--- fs/nfs/file.c 2007-07-10 19:56:30.000000000 +0100 +++ fs/nfs/file.c.nfs_flock_fix 2007-11-13 13:40:06.000000000 +0000 @@ -543,10 +543,24 @@ * Not sure whether that would be unique, though, or whether * that would break in other places. */ - if (!(fl->fl_flags & FL_FLOCK)) + + /** + * Don't simulate flock() using posix locks, as they appear to collide with + * legitimate posix locks from the same process. + */ + if (fl->fl_flags & FL_FLOCK) return -ENOLCK; /* We're simulating flock() locks using posix locks on the server */ + /* ...except we shouldn't get here, due to the above patch. */ fl->fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)filp; fl->fl_start = 0; fl->fl_end = OFFSET_MAX;
So, for us, recompiling the kernel with such patch on the production server fixes all our problems. But, what if we wanted to do this live, could such a subtle change be done without rebooting? You might be thinking right now about the different options that you have on /proc about changing the behaviour of the kernel live, but what if you don’t have such option? What if we wanted to change something and there was no way to do this because it is not implemented or not possible?
Let’s see.
So, from an academic point of view we wanted to see if this could really be done. If the linux kernel would let us do that, if it was feasible. So, we set up a testing box in which we would try to modify the running kernel. How hard would be to do it on the testing box?
It seems there’s a way to do it which my colleague Matthew came up with (all credit to him, I’m just telling the story). Let’s examine the piece of code that we want to change. The offending code lives on the file fs/nfs/file.c of the linux kernel
/* * Lock a (portion of) a file */ static int nfs_flock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl) { dprintk("NFS: nfs_flock(f=%s/%ld, t=%x, fl=%x)n", filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_sb->s_id, filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_ino, fl->fl_type, fl->fl_flags); /* * No BSD flocks over NFS allowed. * Note: we could try to fake a POSIX lock request here by * using ((u32) filp | 0x80000000) or some such as the pid. * Not sure whether that would be unique, though, or whether * that would break in other places. */ if (!(fl->fl_flags & FL_FLOCK)) return -ENOLCK; /* We're simulating flock() locks using posix locks on the server */ fl->fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)filp; fl->fl_start = 0; fl->fl_end = OFFSET_MAX; if (fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK) return do_unlk(filp, cmd, fl); return do_setlk(filp, cmd, fl); }
What we wanted to do is to change the behaviour of the previous function such that the if condition would be:
if (fl->fl_flags & FL_FLOCK) return -ENOLCK;
That means that the change is fairly trivial and that it would result in switching an operation, basically changing the way the branching (in the machine code) is done on the if instruction. If we disassemble such object file, file.o, we get something like
# objdump -d fs/nfs/file.o ... 00000885 <nfs_flock>: 885: 57 push %edi 886: 89 d7 mov %edx,%edi 888: 56 push %esi 889: 89 c6 mov %eax,%esi 88b: 53 push %ebx 88c: 89 cb mov %ecx,%ebx 88e: 83 ec 14 sub $0x14,%esp 891: f6 05 00 00 00 00 40 testb $0x40,0x0 898: 74 3b je 8d5 <nfs_flock+0x50> 89a: 0f b6 41 2c movzbl 0x2c(%ecx),%eax 89e: 89 44 24 10 mov %eax,0x10(%esp) 8a2: 0f b6 41 2d movzbl 0x2d(%ecx),%eax 8a6: 89 44 24 0c mov %eax,0xc(%esp) 8aa: 8b 56 0c mov 0xc(%esi),%edx 8ad: 8b 42 0c mov 0xc(%edx),%eax 8b0: 8b 40 20 mov 0x20(%eax),%eax 8b3: 89 44 24 08 mov %eax,0x8(%esp) 8b7: 8b 42 0c mov 0xc(%edx),%eax 8ba: 8b 80 9c 00 00 00 mov 0x9c(%eax),%eax 8c0: c7 04 24 20 01 00 00 movl $0x120,(%esp) 8c7: 05 40 01 00 00 add $0x140,%eax 8cc: 89 44 24 04 mov %eax,0x4(%esp) 8d0: e8 fc ff ff ff call 8d1 <nfs_flock+0x4c> 8d5: f6 43 2c 02 testb $0x2,0x2c(%ebx) 8d9: 74 47 je 922 <nfs_flock+0x9d> 8db: 80 7b 2d 02 cmpb $0x2,0x2d(%ebx) 8df: 89 73 14 mov %esi,0x14(%ebx) 8e2: c7 43 30 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,0x30(%ebx) 8e9: c7 43 34 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,0x34(%ebx) 8f0: c7 43 38 ff ff ff ff movl $0xffffffff,0x38(%ebx) 8f7: c7 43 3c ff ff ff 7f movl $0x7fffffff,0x3c(%ebx) 8fe: 75 11 jne 911 <nfs_flock+0x8c> 900: 83 c4 14 add $0x14,%esp 903: 89 d9 mov %ebx,%ecx 905: 89 f0 mov %esi,%eax ...
We can actually have a look at the disassembled code of the function flock(). If you have a look at address 0×8d9, there’s an instruction that looks suspiciously similar to the test carried on the if instructions. If you know assembly and know how a compiler works, you could find out that this jump instruction (JE) is just the one we want to change, exactly to a JNE instruction (I am not going to extend here on assembly and compilers and the like. I guess that if you wanted to do this, you should already know this. And, by the way, I’ve no idea of those concepts either, seriously).
If you are not sure if that’s the right instruction, you could recompile the kernel, get the assembly out of the same file.o object and compare it to see what is what changed.
Also, if you look at address 0×898, there another JE instruction which may look like the one we are looking, but this belongs to dprintk as we have debug enabled on that kernel.
If we have a look at the instructions on the IA32 manual, we see that the opcodes for the interesting instructions are:
- JE: 74
- JNE: 75
Ok, so right now, we know that we want to change an JE (with opcode 74) instruction for a JNE instruction (with opcode 75) on address 0×8d9 of the object file “file.o”.
The problem now is to find out where on the kernel memory this piece of code lives. One approach that you might think of doing is grepping the whole memory for a particular sequence of instructions. This is not recommended and I will explain why later on. First, let’s see how we can have access to the kernel memory, where we could possibly modify the data…
If you have a look at your unix system, you’ll see that you have a /dev/kmem special file, with which you can access the memory from the kernel’s point of view. This is quite useful as you can access it in read mode and, more interestingly, write mode. However, doing stuff with it might be a bit dangerous, as you might have guessed. It even seems that some vendors will disable this special file.
Anyway, as I said before, you cannot and don’t want to read or grep the whole memory at /dev/kmem. It seems that the reason is having write-only registers mapped into memory, so a read would crash the system. (You might think that that message is very old, from a distant time, but believe me, it crashes linux if you do so. We tried reading the whole of /dev/mem and the network driver crashed among other little pieces, so don’t bother).
So basically the thing boils down to:
- Finding out exactly where we have to change the kernel (ie, at which memory address)
- Open /dev/kmem and changing it with the right tool
- Hope everything went fine :-)
Finding out where
We need to find out where on the kernel we want to change it. This can be easily do by using tools and information the kernel provides us.
First, we need to find out where the kernel function nfs_flock starts, and that can be done by having a look at the System.map file that is generated every time we compile a kernel. The System.map file is a file that helps kernel developers to debug their code by mapping kernel functions to memory addresses, so it is actually much easier to find stuff. It contains the kernel symbol table with all symbols.
Ours looks like:
... c01a9b3f t do_unlk c01a9b97 t do_setlk c01a9c2b t nfs_lock c01a9d21 t nfs_flock c01a9dcc T nfs_get_root c01a9f3c T nfs_write_inode ...
So now, we know that nfs_flock is located at 0xc01a9d21. We’ll use this in a minute.
We saw that we were having a look at the instruction located at 0×8D9 on the object file file.o (got by using objdump before). We also know that, on such object file, nfs_flock starts at 0×885, right?. That means that, the byte we want to change, is located exactly:
0x8D9 - 0x885 = 0x54
at nfs_flock + 0×54.
Well, as you might know, those adresses (on the object file) are relative to such file, and that, when being linked into the actual kernel, the addresses are all relocated and recalculated. So, basically the right point is on
0xc01a9d21 + 0x54
Opening /dev/kmem and modifying it
Opening /dev/kmem needs to be done with the right tools. This is basically because we need LARGE_FILE support on whichever tool we use to modify it, as the /dev/kmem special file is a representation of the kernel memory and we need access it with a tool that supports large files.
In our system, the easiest way to do it is with perl. First, we double check that perl was compiled with LARGE_FILE support:
root@devbox:~# perl -V | grep LARGE cc='cc', ccflags ='-fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64', Compile-time options: USE_LARGE_FILES root@devbox:~#
and, now, we can modify the kernel in a oneliner such as:
root@devbox:~# perl -e 'open (KERNEL, "+</dev/kmem") || die $!; seek(KERNEL, 0xc01a9d21 + 0x54, 0); syswrite(KERNEL, chr(0x75)); close(KERNEL);' root@devbox:~#
where we are writing 0×75 in the right position (calculated previously).
And that’s all there is to it. If everthing went fine, the kernel behavior has been modified and nothing has crashed.
Again, only do this under a dev box, under your responsibility and if you really really know what you are doing. And only only only if you want to play with a live kernel. Remember, I know nothing about computers.
Multitail
Some time ago I discovered Multitail, a tool for displaying in a tail-like fashion any kind of information. I works by splitting the console
window in many parts and displaying the info you want on each of those screens, whether it is tailing a file or the output of a command via a ssh session. It also has coloring support (which you can extend using regular expressions) to tailor your needs.
I found it really handy when I have to monitor many servers. Just by using some bash power, you can get very nice outputs just by using something like this:
#!/bin/bash rest=$* if [[ -z $rest ]] ;then echo "You need to specify at least one server" exit 1 fi command="multitail -s 2 " for server in $rest do command="$command -CS vmstat -t $server -l \"ssh $server vmstat 1 \" " done eval $command